ONLINE STORE    |   BUY THE BOOK    |   BLOG   |   ABOUT DR. DOLGOFF   |   PRESS   |   CONTACT US

Archive for April, 2010

Government Refuses to Follow FDA’s Suggestion to Cut Back on Salt

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

What child doesn’t love to eat a bag of popcorn, licking the excess salt off of each finger?  Many of the foods we love contain large amounts of sodium.  Foods with lower levels of sodium often taste bland.  But are we once again sabotaging our health for taste?  (Yes!)  And should the government help save the public’s health by mandating decreased levels of salt in the foods American’s consume? (Yes!)

According to a new statement from the Food and Drug Administration, Americans are eating way too much salt.  The FDA has called for the government to impose stricter regulations on how much salt food products can contain.  Unfortunately, the government has no plans to institute these suggestions.  Instead, the FDA must rely on voluntary salt reductions from food manufacturers.  To date, this approach has not worked very well.

How much salt are we eating?  The average American eats 1.5 teaspoons of salt a day, more than double the recommended amount.  In fact, this amount of salt increases the risk for high blood pressure, strokes, and other medical problems.  Don’t think that you are safe by simply forgoing the salt shaker!  Putting salt on foods only adds insult to injury.  Large amounts of salt are hidden in most processed foods and restaurant meals.

Current government guidelines call for a maximum daily sodium intake of 2,300 milligrams.  Health problems appear when intake is above this number.  These new statements suggest a recommended maximum daily sodium intake of 1,500 mg a day (and less for adults over age 50).  It seems we pay no attention to these guidelines as the average consumption of sodium is more than 3,400 mg a day.  Apparently, simply knowing that one’s diet is not healthy is not enough to convince the average American to change his habits.

Rather than calling for a drastic reduction in added sodium, researchers are suggesting a gradual change so the country’s taste buds can adapt and the food industry has time to look for tasty, but healthier, alternatives.  Their proposed regulations would ease both food producers and consumers into a healthier way of eating by setting maximum sodium levels for different foods in a stepwise rollback set over a period of years.  The final goal is to decrease salt consumption by 0.5 teaspoons per day.

Government officials claim that writing new laws to set limits on sodium levels would take much longer than working with food executives on voluntary reductions.  Food executives, however, argue that there are no tasty ways to decrease sodium levels.  But brand-to-brand differences in the same foods suggest that’s not so.

The Institute of Medicine, in a statement given this Tuesday, reported that the food industry has made very little progress in voluntarily reducing sodium.  What a surprise!  You mean companies haven’t been willing to spend large amounts of money to produce a product that, while healthier, will not taste quite as good?  Shocking.  How can a plan based solely on the good nature of food industry executives not succeed?

Salt leads to real health problems.  One in three U.S. adults suffers from high blood pressure, a leading cause of heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure.  The American Medical Association predicts that 150,000 lives could be saved each year, simply by cutting the sodium levels in processed and restaurant foods in half.

  • Share/Bookmark

Kids of Smokers More Likely to Be Obese?

Friday, April 16th, 2010

We all know smoking is a bad habit that not only affects the smoker, but also impacts innocent bystanders.  But new studies are showing just how much the most innocent of all, our children, are impacted by smoking.

New research from the American Heart Association shows that secondhand smoke is particularly harmful to toddlers and obese children.  And its negative effects are broader than previously believed.

There are certain markers of vascular injury (possibly a precursor to heart disease) that indicate an increased risk of heart attack.  Obese children with exposure to secondhand smoke have significantly increased levels of these markers, indicating a likely increased risk for cardiovascular disease.  This new study also showed that obese children had twice the levels of these markers than normal-weight children.

This increased risk is particularly disturbing because overweight and obese children are already at increased risk of heart disease.  Exposure to secondhand smoke is just making a bad situation worse.  And with one out of every three children in our country overweight and obese, exposure to secondhand smoke could lead to a significant number of heart attacks.

As a pediatrician, I have heard every excuse from smoking parents.  “I never smoke around the kids.”  “I wash my hands before touching my children after smoking.”  “I go outside to smoke.”

But the unfortunate truth is that children are exposed to secondhand smoke in every one of the above situations.  Smoke remnants remain on clothes and in hair and continue to be harmful.  There is no way to fully eliminate all the toxins from smoking.  Besides not smoking, of course.

I know that giving up smoking is not easy to do.  Nicotine is addictive and smokers go into withdrawal when they quit.  But there are so many options out there to help smokers.  If you want to quit smoking, you can consider nicotine gum or a nicotine patch.  You can also speak to your physician about certain medications that can help.

The bottom line is that your children’s health is at risk, particularly if they are overweight or obese.  Don’t continue to make excuses or downplay the effect your smoking has on your kids.  Exposure to secondhand smoke is more dangerous than we previously thought.  The best way to ensure your child has a healthy future is to stop smoking today!

American Heart Association (2009, November 18). Secondhand smoke exposure worse for toddlers, obese children. ScienceDaily.

  • Share/Bookmark